adloaded

bidvertiser

Showing posts with label Pakistan. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Pakistan. Show all posts

Sunday, 5 February 2012

Pakistan Blog Awards 2011

Madiha Ishtiaque on 25, Dec 2011 | 7 Comments | in Category: Limelight

Madiha IshtiaqueImran khan

Blog Awards 2011 with all their ho-humness were all about youth and encouraging their voices to be heard across. With the aim of providing a platform to the views that usually go unheard or are stifled owing to the prevalent intolerance in the Pakistani society today, Google, PC World and Telenor came together under a common banner of Pakistan Blog Awards and arranged a two day event, Unconference and Gala Night.

The modestly glitzy Gala Night at Regent Plaza Hotel had all the right ingredients to not only make the event a big success but also to provide an incentive and a moral boost to the people who make significant efforts in bringing about a change- a common rhetoric these days.

In the backdrop of PTI’s massive success in Lahore, the idea of using social media as an effective tool in contributing to spread awareness and enlightenment is rapidly catching on. It has also brought some very talented people glutted with the art of articulation, to the limelight, so they could employ their skills to raise voices on the issues generally tuned out as Taboos. With so many bloggers revving up and social media activities on their upswing, Blog Awards served to acknowledge and honor these efforts and bring them to another level.

Some of the prominent bloggers and twitteratis present on the occasion were: Faisal Qureshi, Beena Sarwar, Ali K Chishti, Awab Alvi, Faisal Kapadia, Badar Khushnood, Rabia Gharib, Abdul Hameed Kath, Abid Beli, Jehanara .

While the event was still catching its momentum after recitation, opening speech and a tableau, Imran Khan’s sudden appearance phenomenally stoked the fire to the event. In his brief appearance, he commended the efforts of the bloggers and asserted that youth and bloggers have supported him a lot in his movement and his presence was purely with the intent of appreciating and supporting them.

Out of 25 nominations from each category, some of the blogs that won awards were:

Aisha Aijaz’s ‘My Bit for Change’ – for the Best Social Activist BlogBeena Sarwar’s (The News, Jang Group)  BlogSpot – Best Journalist BlogAli K Chishtie’s BlogSpot Best Political Coverage Blog

Pakistan Blog awards surely stand in the league of their own. Promoting the freedom of meaningful expression, such events are surely set to bring out the much needed positive change in our society.

Friday, 3 February 2012

�ANP leaders had not opposed Pakistan creation�

LAHORE: Federal Minister for Railways Ghulam Ahmed Bilour on Monday said that all the prevailing problems in the country would have been solved had the philosophy of Baacha Khan was implemented practically.

Addressing a conference held in connection with the death anniversary of the founder of the National Awami Party Khan Abdul Ghaffar Khan (Baacha Khan), Ghulam Ahmed Bilour said the perception about his leadership that it was against the creation of Pakistan was not true.

He said Baacha Khan did not oppose the creation of Pakistan but raised voice against the divisions of the Muslims of the region. He said Baacha Khan and his son Khan Abdul Wali Khan were great leaders whose lives revolved around the struggle for the rights of the people. He said the British wanted to implement their theory of ëDivide and Ruleí which was opposed by Baacha Khan and his followers as well as many notables like Maulana Azad.

Bilour also said that the ANP was a party which never encouraged feudalism and the interference of establishment in political affairs, adding that it was also the main reason why it could not make significant inroads in the province like Punjab.

He also said that the ANP remained a target of politicians of Punjab and was even called as foreign ëagentsí but in reality, it was a party with an ideology and a strong patriotic bond with Pakistan. Main speakers of the conference included Secretary General ANP Ehsan Wyne, IA Rehman, Arif Izhar and Peter Jacob.


US working hard to improve ties with Pakistan: Pentagon

ISLAMABAD: United States Defence Secretary Leon Panetta and his colleagues in the US government have been working hard to improve US-Pakistan relations since the Bin Laden operation.

This was stated in a clarification issued by the US Department of Defence on recent comments made by Secretary of Defence Leon Panetta in an interview with 60 Minutes. the Pentagon Press Secretary, George Little, said in a statement issued through the US embassy here on Sunday that in an interview with 60 Minutes several months ago, Secretary Panetta made clear his belief — which other senior US officials have also expressed — that Osama Bin Laden had some kind of support network within Pakistan.

He said the secretary indicated in the same interview that he has seen no evidence that Bin Laden was supported by the Pakistani government or that senior Pakistani officials knew he was hiding in the Abbottabad compound.


Thursday, 2 February 2012

Secret Nato report accuses Pakistan of helping Taliban

LONDON: Pakistan’s security services are secretly aiding Afghanistan’s Taliban, who assume their victory is inevitable once Western troops leave, a secret Nato document says, according to reports on Wednesday.

The leaked report — seen by The Times newspaper and BBC — was compiled from information gleaned from insurgent detainees and was given to Nato commanders in Afghanistan last month, the media reports said.

The “State of the Taliban” document claims that Islamabad, via Pakistan’s ISI intelligence agency, is “intimately involved” with the insurgency. The BBC said the report was based on material from 27,000 interrogations of more than 4,000 captured Taliban and al-Qaeda operatives.

“Pakistan’s manipulation of the Taliban senior leadership continues unabatedly,” the report was quoted as saying. Taliban captives revealed how Islamabad was using a web of intermediaries and spies to provide strategic advice to the Taliban on fighting Western coalition troops.

“The government of Pakistan remains intimately involved with the Taliban,” the report said. “ISI is thoroughly aware of Taliban activities and the whereabouts of senior Taliban personnel. Senior Taliban leaders meet regularly with ISI personnel, who advise on strategy and relay any pertinent concerns of the government of Pakistan.

“ISI officers tout the need for continued jihad and expulsion of foreign invaders from Afghanistan.” However, there was little evidence from the detainees that Islamabad was providing funding or weaponry.

Kabul, which accuses Islamabad of supporting the 10-year Taliban insurgency in Afghanistan, put relations on ice after the September murder of its peace envoy Burhanuddin Rabbani, which one Afghan minister blamed on Pakistani spies.

The Times quoted the report as saying the Taliban’s “strength, motivation, funding and tactical proficiency remains intact”, despite setbacks in 2011.

“Many Afghans are already bracing themselves for an eventual return of the Taliban,” it said. “Once (Nato force) Isaf is no longer a factor, Taliban consider their victory inevitable.” The US Department of Defense said it could not comment on the report but set out its fears about Pakistan and its influence in Afghanistan.

“We have not seen the report, and therefore cannot offer comment on it specifically,” Pentagon spokesman George Little told AFP.

“We have long been concerned about ties between elements of the ISI and some extremist networks.”

US Defence Secretary Leon Panetta “has also been clear that he believes that the safe havens in Pakistan remain a serious problem and need to be addressed by Pakistani authorities.”

The report said there had been unprecedented interest in joining the Taliban cause in 2011 — even from members of the Afghan government.

“Afghan civilians frequently prefer Taliban governance over the Afghan government, usually as a result of government corruption,” it was reported as saying.

It said the Taliban were deliberately going soft in some areas to encourage Nato troops to leave faster, while doing local deals with the Afghan forces who take over.

Some in the Afghan security forces collaborated with the Taliban, selling arms and sharing intelligence, the report said.

The Times, in an editorial, said Pakistan was “actively hindering reconciliation” between the Taliban and Kabul with a “systematic effort” to destabilise President Hamid Karzai’s government.

“The ISI emerges from this document looking considerably more villainous, even, than the Taliban itself,” it said.

Pakistan hit out angrily at the report, calling it “frivolous” and “not worth commenting on”.

“This is frivolous, to put it mildly. We are committed to non-interference in Afghanistan and expect all other states to strictly adhere to this principle,” foreign ministry spokesman Abdul Basit told AFP.

A senior security official condemned the leak, as reported by the BBC, which also broadcast a documentary “Secret Pakistan” last year accusing parts of Pakistan’s intelligence service of complicity with Taliban militants. “The report is not available, leaks not worth commenting,” he told this agency.

Reuters adds: The US military said in a secret report that the Taliban, backed by Pakistan, are set to retake control of Afghanistan after Nato-led forces withdraw, raising the prospect of a major failure of Western policy after a costly war.

Lieutenant Colonel Jimmie Cummings, a spokesman for the Nato-led International Security Assistance Force, confirmed the existence of the document, reported on Wednesday by Britain’s Times newspaper and the BBC. But he said it was not a strategic study.

“The classified document in question is a compilation of Taliban detainee opinions,” he said. “It’s not an analysis, nor is it meant to be considered an analysis.”

Nevertheless, it could be interpreted as a damning assessment of the war, dragging into its 11th year and aimed at blocking a Taliban return to power. It could also be seen as an admission of defeat and could reinforce the view of Taliban hardliners that they should not negotiate with the United States and President Hamid Karzai’s unpopular government while in a position of strength.

The US military said in the document that Pakistan’s Inter-Services Intelligence (ISI) security agency was assisting the Taliban in directing attacks against foreign forces. Reasserting control over the country would be more difficult a second time for the Taliban, however, with Afghan police and soldiers expected to number around 350,000 beyond 2014 and some foreign troops likely to remain, including elite forces.

The Times said the “highly classified” report was put together by the US military at Bagram air base, north of Kabul, for top Nato officers last month.

The document may leave some US policymakers wondering whether the war was worth the cost in human lives and funding. As of late January, 1,889 US soldiers had been killed in a conflict that was launched after the Sept 11, 2001 attacks and has drained almost half a trillion dollars from US coffers.


Tuesday, 31 January 2012

Clowns and Red Faces: Comedy Pakistan Style

Ayaz Amir on 27, Jan 2012 | 16 Comments | in Category: Insight

Ayaz Amirmem1

Coming from a dubious salesman a shady communication treated as Holy Scripture. Only we could do this, without stopping to think what it says about us: a nation of chumps hard put to smell the difference between the earth-shaking and the trivial.

The cast of characters in the memo affair couldn’t get more sublime: chief of the army, chief spymaster, shining jurists, a posse of media wizards with flecks of froth on their angry faces, two reputed politicos with pretensions of reformism not only buying into the conspiracy tale called Memogate but scarcely pausing before becoming its leading champions, one of the reformers taking this joke to the Supreme Court, thus lending it weight and respectability.

The generals in question have a reputation for deep thinking. Hmm. If these are the fruits of deep thought the alternative is best left to the imagination. There is no shortage of comics, or call them patriots, who say this is a God-gifted country. That may be so but did the Most High also gift us our priceless sense of humour?

An adventurer who has now gone a bit quiet but who had everyone dancing to his tune manages to take an entire nation for a ride. If he had a heady feeling he can be forgiven. But why blame the nation? Ordinary folk have a better grasp of reality. Mansoor Ijaz’s shenanigans, for that is what they were from day one, fooled the Pakistani establishment, or at least parts thereof.

But wait, it gets richer. Mansoor was the man who made his column-writing and chat-show reputation in the United States by maligning the Pakistan army and ISI. And he becomes the ISI’s star witness in the memo affair. Nor is this all. When everything hangs on his appearance before the Supreme Court-ordered investigation commission, comprising three heavyweight lordships, Mansoor puts the last nail in the embarrassment of his various champions by refusing to appear.

His counsel Akram Sheikh, Falstaff sans the wit or humour but unwittingly funny in his own right, goes into contortions of rage trying to explain why Mansoor cannot come while Interior Minister Rehman Malik, scarcely able to control his laughter, says adequate security, yes, but if Mansoor wanted band and baaje (instruments) on his arrival that was a bit difficult.

There are laws against contempt, and rightly so. May not the time have come for a law against self-inflicted ridicule? For this is what has happened in the memo affair: Pakistan’s leading institutions going out of their way to invite scorn and laughter. And all because of that one ambition embedded deep in the genetic code of the Pakistani establishment: the desire for political engineering.

Pakistan’s best and brightest and, it has to be said, the not-so-bright, thought that Mansoor Ijaz’s memo was their chance, what they had been seeking and not getting these past three years. So casting ordinary judgment aside they seized it and made heavy weather of it, turning an absurdity into a high-stakes drama, convinced that with only a little pushing the walls they wanted to bring down would come tumbling down, and the long desired for change would happen at the top…as muffled drums beat a military tattoo in the background.

But the walls, for all the cracks in their facade, have withstood the shocks administered to them, and the prime instigator of this affair, the international financier with a yen for intrigue and publicity, has been exposed as the charlatan many suspected him to be all along, his word taken seriously only by certified dupes.

Hardly surprising in the circumstances if there are a lot of red faces around, trying as best they can to hide their embarrassment and figure out what has hit them. It takes time for emperors to be stripped of their clothes. But this de-stripping has occurred at astonishing speed: one moment national balloons full of pomp and righteous anger, the next moment the sound of gas escaping…the balloon deflated.

But, sobering thought: paladins supposed to be guardians of the truth (as enshrined in the law), keepers of the national flame, defenders of ideology, protectors of our nuclear secrets, thus exposed. Sets one thinking about the quality of our heroes. If this is the best we have what might be our worst?

When Admiral Mike Mullen, no enemy of Pakistan, said that he did not consider Mansoor’s communication worthy of serious notice, when Gen James Jones said much the same, going on to add in the same breath that Pakistan seemed a country bent on self-destruction, shouldn’t our good and great have paid some heed to these caveats? Instead, in full possession of their senses, they chose to make clowns of themselves. Conscious clowns can be intelligent souls, circus lore testifying to this circumstance. But unwitting clowns are a different thing altogether.

Never reinforce failure is a maxim on the lips of even half-educated military men. There is nothing to be mined from this affair except more ignominy and ridicule. It is time to pull up the tents, close this particular adventure camp and move on.

Zardari and company may deserve purgatory. They may deserve something more. But if the desire for political engineering remains irresistible, as it has been these past 65 years, there should be other ways of achieving it. Elections are the prime means of change around the globe, except in those forgotten corners where the sun of democracy, with all its blemishes, has yet to rise. Elections were very much a part of the divine scheme of things, as we like to believe, which led to the creation of what in our more fervent moments we still like to call the fortress of Islam. Why not, for once in our benighted history, give elections a chance?

Meanwhile a measure of penance and humility may do all concerned some good, even if humility is not amongst the prime Pakistani virtues. The General Staff is unassailable, so let us keep it out of the equation, humility certainly not a construction material widely used in General Headquarters. But like the Roman custom of a slave whispering into the ear of a triumphant emperor, “Remember, Caesar, thou art mortal,” it may not be such a bad idea to put up a bust of Mansoor Ijaz in the foyer of ISI headquarters in Aabpara as a cautionary reminder that even the best are not above making asses of themselves.

About the guardians of the law, a temporary vow of silence – perish the thought of anything more permanent – may be in order.

Imran Khan, living up to his reputation of being a slow learner, continues to harp on the theme of getting to the bottom of the memo affair. What will it take to convince him that this is the bottom? Nawaz Sharif, considerably smarter, is already walking away himself from this saga as if he had nothing to do with it, although one of his lawyers, Mustafa Ramday, is still saying that the commission could travel abroad to get Mansoor Ijaz’s statement. Why does the name Ramday send a shiver down my spine? Are we missing some connection?

Media warriors are a tougher lot. It won’t take them long to simply shrug off their embarrassment and say that the anti-climax we are seeing is part of a sordid deal. Between exactly whom we know not for sure, but a deal still…you get the point. It could even be part of yet another American plot.

It won’t be long before these gladiators take to their swords and trumpets again, to lift the veil of secrecy over the next conspiracy against national security. This is just an intermission. The show goes on.

Monday, 23 January 2012

US vows �mutually respectful� Pakistan ties

WASHINGTON: The United States “remains committed to a strong, mutually respectful” relationship with Pakistan and Washington’s civilian assistance for the country has not been affected in the aftermath of the November 26 strikes on Pakistani border-posts, the State Department said.

“We consider bilateral US civilian assistance to be an important component of that relationship and believe it can help Pakistan become a more prosperous, stable and democratic state, which serves the national interests of both the United States and Pakistan,” the Office of Spokesperson Victoria Nuland said in response to a question taken at the daily briefing.

“Civilian assistance to Pakistan continues and has not been interrupted since the tragic November 26 incident,” the spokesperson noted.

The November 26 attacks on Pakistani check-posts claimed the lives of two dozen soldiers, angering the Pakistani nation and the government. After the incident, Islamabad closed Nato supply routes and initiated a full review of ties with the United States, which is nearing completion.

The State Department also noted that since the passage of the Kerry-Lugar-Berman legislation in October 2009, the US government has disbursed $2.2 billion in civilian assistance, including approximately $550 million in emergency humanitarian assistance.

“In FY 2011 specifically, we disbursed approximately $855 million (not including any emergency humanitarian assistance).

Our non-humanitarian civilian assistance funds are spent in five priority sectors: energy, economic growth, stabilization of the border regions, education, and health. Notably, in 2011 the people of the United States supported the construction of 210 kilometers of road in Fata and Khyber-Pakhtunkhwa, funded the world’s largest Fulbright exchange program, and sponsored initiatives promoting private sector growth and civil society development in Pakistan.”

Earlier, spokesperson Nuland shared the view that Pakistan and the United States should pursue broad-based bilateral relations.

It is “completely in sync with our view of the US-Pakistani relationship, that it should be broad and deep, that we have work to do together across the range of issues, whether we’re talking about increasingly open society, economic things, development things, and the full range of security issues. So we would certainly share the view that we have a lot to do together across the range of concerns,” she remarked at the daily briefing.


Pakistan turns down Grossman�s request to visit Islamabad

WASHINGTON: Pakistan turned down the request of US Special Representative for Pakistan and Afghanistan, Marc Grossman, to travel to Islamabad during his current trip to the region that started this week, The Washington Post reported.

As Pakistan continues to block Nato supply routes to Afghanistan after the deadly Nato attacks of last year and no change is visible in its policies with regards its links with extremist groups, America’s patience with Pakistan is growing thinner, US officials said.

What has been annoying the Obama administration is the fact that Pakistan is increasingly standing upfront against the US and is saying “no” more often than ever to any American requests with regards the war against terrorism. A case in the point: Foreign Minister Hina Rabbani Khar bluntly told US Secretary of State Hillary Clinton that any unauthorised flight into Pakistan’s air space risked being shot down, the paper said. Not only this, Pakistan turned down the request of US Special Representative for Pakistan and Afghanistan, Marc Grossman, to travel to Islamabad during his current trip to the region that started this week, the daily said.

“In the United States, Obama is under political pressure to show Islamabad who is the global boss. Patience here has grown paper-thin with what is seen as Pakistani double-dealing and intransigence that is getting in the way of efforts to wind down the Afghan war,” the Post reported in an analysis based on conversation and interviews with unnamed officials from both the US and Pakistan.

“Pakistan also has snubbed US efforts to boost the Afghan economy with a gas pipeline that would run from Tajikistan through Afghanistan to Pakistani ports. Instead, it has reiterated its plans to proceed with an alternative pipeline from Iran,” the daily said.

The Obama administration has decided not to go public yet and will wait till the Pakistani parliament completes its review of US-Pak ties. “We have views on where we would like to see this go,” a US official was quoted as saying.

But it will “take another week or two for their internal process to come to some kind of formal communication that would be communicated back to us,” the official added.

A senior Pakistani government official told The Post that the committee’s recommendations will probably include a demand for explicit US assurances that there will be no violation of sovereignty, no American boots on the ground, no more unilateral raids, no manned air strikes.

The official said there is likely to be some arrangement on drone attacks, with Pakistan calling for large reductions in their number and geographic scope, and demanding prior notification and approval of every strike.


US ready for talks with Pakistan

NEW DELHI: Downplaying Pakistan’s refusal to disallow his visit, President Barack Obama’s Special Representative for AfPak Marc Grossman Friday said he will wait till the Pakistani parliament and government reassess and re-evaluate the relationship with the US.

Amidst political crisis in Pakistan, Grossman also said the US supports the civilian government and democracy there. “The Pakistan government has sought time to re-evaluate its relationship with the US. I respect that. I would be ready for talks when Pakistan is ready,” he told reporters after meeting Indian Foreign Secretary Ranjan Mathai here.

On whether Pakistan was discussed during his meeting with Mathai, Grossman said the Indian government can speak for itself on Pakistan. “What I would say is that of course we follow issues in Pakistan carefully.”

Grossman also said the US would continue to reinforce its conversation with Pakistan on the situation in Afghanistan and pitched the need for reviving trilateral dialogue. On the current confrontation in Pakistan, he said the US supports the civilian government and democracy in Pakistan. “This is a question for Pakistanis. This is an internal question for them. They have their own ways of going forward and I would not comment any further on internal developments,” he said.


Saturday, 21 January 2012

Pakistan refused to allow Grossman visit: US

WASHINGTON: The State Department has said that the US special envoy to Pakistan and Afghanistan Marc Grossman wanted to visit Pakistan but owing to prevailing situation he was not allowed, Geo News reported.

The US State Department Spokesman said Pakistan refused to grant permission due to prevailing situation.

The spokesman said United States wants better relations with Pakistan, adding that we should go ahead as there was no other way.

Pakistan to file lawsuit in ICA against

ISLAMABAD: Pakistan is all set to become the first country filing a lawsuit against the United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change (UNFCCC) in the International Court of Arbitration (ICA) for awarding carbon credits to India on highly controversial Nimoo-Bazga Dam, sources said here on Tuesday.

Sources said the prime minister has already approved a summary for filing a case in the ICA and the Ministry of Foreign Affairs is sorting out modalities in coordination with ministries of water and power and environmental wing of ministry of disaster management to raise the question about how the UNFCCC awarded carbon credits to India without trans-boundary Environmental Impact Assessment Certificate.

Sources said it has been identified that a report by the UNFCCC paved the way for Nimoo-Bazga Dam project in which it stated that it would have no negative environmental impact on any neighbouring country.

“We have come to know about a report by the UNFCCC and we are surprised how it did so despite the fact that no trans-boundary environmental impact assessment certificate was conducted by India,” sources said.


Wednesday, 18 January 2012

Pakistan to file lawsuit in ICA against

ISLAMABAD: Pakistan is all set to become the first country filing a lawsuit against the United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change (UNFCCC) in the International Court of Arbitration (ICA) for awarding carbon credits to India on highly controversial Nimoo-Bazga Dam, sources said here on Tuesday.

Sources said the prime minister has already approved a summary for filing a case in the ICA and the Ministry of Foreign Affairs is sorting out modalities in coordination with ministries of water and power and environmental wing of ministry of disaster management to raise the question about how the UNFCCC awarded carbon credits to India without trans-boundary Environmental Impact Assessment Certificate.

Sources said it has been identified that a report by the UNFCCC paved the way for Nimoo-Bazga Dam project in which it stated that it would have no negative environmental impact on any neighbouring country.

“We have come to know about a report by the UNFCCC and we are surprised how it did so despite the fact that no trans-boundary environmental impact assessment certificate was conducted by India,” sources said.

Pakistan turns down Grossman�s request to visit Islamabad

WASHINGTON: Pakistan turned down the request of US Special Representative for Pakistan and Afghanistan, Marc Grossman, to travel to Islamabad during his current trip to the region that started this week, The Washington Post reported.

As Pakistan continues to block Nato supply routes to Afghanistan after the deadly Nato attacks of last year and no change is visible in its policies with regards its links with extremist groups, America’s patience with Pakistan is growing thinner, US officials said.

What has been annoying the Obama administration is the fact that Pakistan is increasingly standing upfront against the US and is saying “no” more often than ever to any American requests with regards the war against terrorism. A case in the point: Foreign Minister Hina Rabbani Khar bluntly told US Secretary of State Hillary Clinton that any unauthorised flight into Pakistan’s air space risked being shot down, the paper said. Not only this, Pakistan turned down the request of US Special Representative for Pakistan and Afghanistan, Marc Grossman, to travel to Islamabad during his current trip to the region that started this week, the daily said.

“In the United States, Obama is under political pressure to show Islamabad who is the global boss. Patience here has grown paper-thin with what is seen as Pakistani double-dealing and intransigence that is getting in the way of efforts to wind down the Afghan war,” the Post reported in an analysis based on conversation and interviews with unnamed officials from both the US and Pakistan.

“Pakistan also has snubbed US efforts to boost the Afghan economy with a gas pipeline that would run from Tajikistan through Afghanistan to Pakistani ports. Instead, it has reiterated its plans to proceed with an alternative pipeline from Iran,” the daily said.

The Obama administration has decided not to go public yet and will wait till the Pakistani parliament completes its review of US-Pak ties. “We have views on where we would like to see this go,” a US official was quoted as saying.

But it will “take another week or two for their internal process to come to some kind of formal communication that would be communicated back to us,” the official added.

A senior Pakistani government official told The Post that the committee’s recommendations will probably include a demand for explicit US assurances that there will be no violation of sovereignty, no American boots on the ground, no more unilateral raids, no manned air strikes.

The official said there is likely to be some arrangement on drone attacks, with Pakistan calling for large reductions in their number and geographic scope, and demanding prior notification and approval of every strike.

Wednesday, 11 January 2012

U.S. Fires First Drone In Pakistan Since Fatal Hit

A weekly podcast of the biggest news and best stories from NPR's foreign correspondents from around the world.

Subscribe


View the original article here