adloaded

bidvertiser

Tuesday 31 January 2012

Clowns and Red Faces: Comedy Pakistan Style

Ayaz Amir on 27, Jan 2012 | 16 Comments | in Category: Insight

Ayaz Amirmem1

Coming from a dubious salesman a shady communication treated as Holy Scripture. Only we could do this, without stopping to think what it says about us: a nation of chumps hard put to smell the difference between the earth-shaking and the trivial.

The cast of characters in the memo affair couldn’t get more sublime: chief of the army, chief spymaster, shining jurists, a posse of media wizards with flecks of froth on their angry faces, two reputed politicos with pretensions of reformism not only buying into the conspiracy tale called Memogate but scarcely pausing before becoming its leading champions, one of the reformers taking this joke to the Supreme Court, thus lending it weight and respectability.

The generals in question have a reputation for deep thinking. Hmm. If these are the fruits of deep thought the alternative is best left to the imagination. There is no shortage of comics, or call them patriots, who say this is a God-gifted country. That may be so but did the Most High also gift us our priceless sense of humour?

An adventurer who has now gone a bit quiet but who had everyone dancing to his tune manages to take an entire nation for a ride. If he had a heady feeling he can be forgiven. But why blame the nation? Ordinary folk have a better grasp of reality. Mansoor Ijaz’s shenanigans, for that is what they were from day one, fooled the Pakistani establishment, or at least parts thereof.

But wait, it gets richer. Mansoor was the man who made his column-writing and chat-show reputation in the United States by maligning the Pakistan army and ISI. And he becomes the ISI’s star witness in the memo affair. Nor is this all. When everything hangs on his appearance before the Supreme Court-ordered investigation commission, comprising three heavyweight lordships, Mansoor puts the last nail in the embarrassment of his various champions by refusing to appear.

His counsel Akram Sheikh, Falstaff sans the wit or humour but unwittingly funny in his own right, goes into contortions of rage trying to explain why Mansoor cannot come while Interior Minister Rehman Malik, scarcely able to control his laughter, says adequate security, yes, but if Mansoor wanted band and baaje (instruments) on his arrival that was a bit difficult.

There are laws against contempt, and rightly so. May not the time have come for a law against self-inflicted ridicule? For this is what has happened in the memo affair: Pakistan’s leading institutions going out of their way to invite scorn and laughter. And all because of that one ambition embedded deep in the genetic code of the Pakistani establishment: the desire for political engineering.

Pakistan’s best and brightest and, it has to be said, the not-so-bright, thought that Mansoor Ijaz’s memo was their chance, what they had been seeking and not getting these past three years. So casting ordinary judgment aside they seized it and made heavy weather of it, turning an absurdity into a high-stakes drama, convinced that with only a little pushing the walls they wanted to bring down would come tumbling down, and the long desired for change would happen at the top…as muffled drums beat a military tattoo in the background.

But the walls, for all the cracks in their facade, have withstood the shocks administered to them, and the prime instigator of this affair, the international financier with a yen for intrigue and publicity, has been exposed as the charlatan many suspected him to be all along, his word taken seriously only by certified dupes.

Hardly surprising in the circumstances if there are a lot of red faces around, trying as best they can to hide their embarrassment and figure out what has hit them. It takes time for emperors to be stripped of their clothes. But this de-stripping has occurred at astonishing speed: one moment national balloons full of pomp and righteous anger, the next moment the sound of gas escaping…the balloon deflated.

But, sobering thought: paladins supposed to be guardians of the truth (as enshrined in the law), keepers of the national flame, defenders of ideology, protectors of our nuclear secrets, thus exposed. Sets one thinking about the quality of our heroes. If this is the best we have what might be our worst?

When Admiral Mike Mullen, no enemy of Pakistan, said that he did not consider Mansoor’s communication worthy of serious notice, when Gen James Jones said much the same, going on to add in the same breath that Pakistan seemed a country bent on self-destruction, shouldn’t our good and great have paid some heed to these caveats? Instead, in full possession of their senses, they chose to make clowns of themselves. Conscious clowns can be intelligent souls, circus lore testifying to this circumstance. But unwitting clowns are a different thing altogether.

Never reinforce failure is a maxim on the lips of even half-educated military men. There is nothing to be mined from this affair except more ignominy and ridicule. It is time to pull up the tents, close this particular adventure camp and move on.

Zardari and company may deserve purgatory. They may deserve something more. But if the desire for political engineering remains irresistible, as it has been these past 65 years, there should be other ways of achieving it. Elections are the prime means of change around the globe, except in those forgotten corners where the sun of democracy, with all its blemishes, has yet to rise. Elections were very much a part of the divine scheme of things, as we like to believe, which led to the creation of what in our more fervent moments we still like to call the fortress of Islam. Why not, for once in our benighted history, give elections a chance?

Meanwhile a measure of penance and humility may do all concerned some good, even if humility is not amongst the prime Pakistani virtues. The General Staff is unassailable, so let us keep it out of the equation, humility certainly not a construction material widely used in General Headquarters. But like the Roman custom of a slave whispering into the ear of a triumphant emperor, “Remember, Caesar, thou art mortal,” it may not be such a bad idea to put up a bust of Mansoor Ijaz in the foyer of ISI headquarters in Aabpara as a cautionary reminder that even the best are not above making asses of themselves.

About the guardians of the law, a temporary vow of silence – perish the thought of anything more permanent – may be in order.

Imran Khan, living up to his reputation of being a slow learner, continues to harp on the theme of getting to the bottom of the memo affair. What will it take to convince him that this is the bottom? Nawaz Sharif, considerably smarter, is already walking away himself from this saga as if he had nothing to do with it, although one of his lawyers, Mustafa Ramday, is still saying that the commission could travel abroad to get Mansoor Ijaz’s statement. Why does the name Ramday send a shiver down my spine? Are we missing some connection?

Media warriors are a tougher lot. It won’t take them long to simply shrug off their embarrassment and say that the anti-climax we are seeing is part of a sordid deal. Between exactly whom we know not for sure, but a deal still…you get the point. It could even be part of yet another American plot.

It won’t be long before these gladiators take to their swords and trumpets again, to lift the veil of secrecy over the next conspiracy against national security. This is just an intermission. The show goes on.

Let the Letter Be Written, Mr President

Wajahat.S.Khan on 23, Jan 2012 | 12 Comments | in Category: Debate Desk

Wajahat.S.Khanpres

Let the letter be written, Mr President, for your party which was founded for the people on a social welfare platform. Let it be, so that this People’s Party can survive beyond the histrionics of the Zardari legacy. Write it because the country’s liberal agenda – a crucially required left-of-centre school of thought – depends critically on the integrity of your party’s raison d’etre of roti-kapra-makaan. There is a difference, Sir, between being martyred and playing victim. Sure, Sir: Your party has bled before, and can even take murder. But do not transfuse its blood for your own political dialysis. Do not simulate injury, Sir. Display a long-term view as your party’s leader. The PPP will only thank you for your selfless perspective, which would be the real sacrifice that it needs to survive against rising tsunami of Banni Gala, the incumbent takht of Lahore, and even the garrisoned fortress of Chaklala.


Let it be written – Mr President – for your friend and lawyer, Aitzaz Ahsan, who will lose his political credibility, if not his legal fees, by the time all of this is over. You’ve already driven away most of the old guard of the PPP. Aitzaz is a staunch pillar of the Piplis; a vanguard of your Jiyalas; and a hero of the lawyers’ movement. He is an international brand of repute that you can use anytime. Deploy him for larger conflicts that are winnable. Do not debase him in the public eye, at the twilight of his career, by putting him in a position where his credentials are permanently damaged. Fight the long war, Mr President. By burning your Bishop now, you will lose the clergy – this judiciary – in the coming years. In this unfair land, you and successors will need the courts to dispense justice again and again. Look beyond the corner with Aitzaz and the judges. Don’t get your messenger killed, Sir.

Let the letter be written, Mr President. You’ve seen what your inflexibility has done to your prime minister. You’ve witnessed how your politicking has disabled this administration’s performance and affected its governance. If you’re so disconnected from the hellish, unread, backbreaking, murderous, dark and cold reality that is everyday life in Pakistan’s economy, then look at the opinion polls to assess the damage. Peruse the international press, if not the local one, to count your losses. Do remember, Sir, that you had an open playing field when your administration was elected in 2008. Back then, your prime minister was under your thumb, and parliament and public opinion were under his. All that your combine had to do was govern, and govern well, to strengthen your coalition and guarantee your incumbency. You could have played a god, and all the PM had to do was deliver your message and wrath. But you chose to play monster – pulverising national and even your party’s sentiment – and your PM lost a captive audience. Today, Gilani risks official disqualification, and you stand a verdict away from becoming yet another president who saw off an elected premier, pawning him off for power; only this time, he would be your man, not your enemy. That would be a strange legacy, Sir. Imagine what it will do to the confidence of your rank and file if you were ever to vie power again.

Let the letter be written, Mr President. If not for your party, your friends or your pawns, then for your successor. For Assefa, so that she may be able to face the music when it plays again, for it shall blare on. Leave her a world where she doesn’t have to sign her life away to deals or settle for secret arrangements to assume power. Her inheritance shouldn’t just be her mother’s murder or her father’s disrepute. It should be her party leader’s exemplary sacrifice of doing the right thing – not necessarily the most immediately, and politically, profitable thing. Let it be written, Sir, so she will be able to hold her head up high one day and say her father defied everyone except the law of this land. Don’t put her in a position where her detractors taunt her that she is the legate of a man who hid behind immunity, who sacrificed the stability of the system just to cling to office and manoeuvre electoral victories: a man who limped and staggered past the post. Let Assefa make history, Sir, and not be judged by it. Surely, she will gain more from your selflessness, if you choose to display it, for she will always have less to answer for as the daughter and successor of a man humbled by the laws of political gravity, if not a president empowered by the spin and wizardry of legal druids.

Let the letter be written, Mr President. Recall that day in 1988 when your departed wife, the Mohtarma, rolled back into power, riding the wave of anger over the injustice done to her father and her people. Recollect the moment of purity and victory when she was elected to the highest office in the land for the first time. Remember the redemption and innocence of the 1988 elections, despite the odds being stacked against her. The NRO is not about her, Mr President. She has already proven herself beyond the call of duty. Pakistan will always love and respect her – with her faults and fallibilities as well her strengths and leadership.

No, Sir: The NRO is your trial, a test not just of your office and person, but also your courage and conscience. Rest assured, Mr President: Nobody wants to dance on Benazir’s grave. But this country is assessing you, Sir, and it has every right to do so. Today, this land has a soul that is multi-coloured and eclectic, not just khaki and helmeted. This Pakistan has many hues of hope – a rainbow coalition of aspirations – and though far from perfectly justified, balanced or even explicable, our thirst for accountability is so immediate and so critical that you will destroy your wife’s legacy, your children’s future, your successors’ confidence, your friends’ prospects and your party’s promise, if you fight this existentialist wave of sought justice through contrived political manoeuvrings.

So let it be written, Mr President. For your martyr of democracy, Mohtarma Benazir Bhutto. For Assefa Bhutto Zardari. For Yousuf Raza Gilani, and Aitzaz Ahsan, and the Pakistan People’s Party. But look above them all, Sir. Let it be written for setting a new precedent. For raising the bar. For breaching mediocrity. After all, Sir, this is the Islamic Republic of Pakistan, and our hapless state today asks for nothing from her president – only that he behaves presidential.

Afghans sentenced in Canada �honour killings�

KINGSTON, Canada: An Afghan immigrant couple and their son were found guilty in a Canadian court Sunday of first degree murder in the 2009 “honour killing” deaths of four female family members, and sentenced to 25 years in prison.

The jury in Kingston, Ontario, deliberated for two days before pronouncing a guilty sentence against Mohammad Shafia, 58, his 42-year-old wife Tooba Muhammad Yahya and their 21-year-old son Hamed.

Judge Robert Maranger called the crimes “heinous” and “twisted” as he sentenced the accused to 25 years in prison, and said the evidence clearly supported the charges. The three defendants were found guilty to the deaths of the couple’s three daughters and Shafia’s first wife in his polygamous marriage after a four-month-long trial that heard dozens of witnesses testify.

The bodies of the victims — Zainab Shafia, 19; Sahar Shafia, 17; Geeti Shafia, 13; and Rona Amir Mohammad, 50 — were found in a car submerged in a canal lock near Kingston, Ontario in June 2009.

Prosecutor Laurie Lacelle told the court during the trial that the deaths were “honour killings” committed to remove the perceived shame the women had brought on their family. Court testimony told of an abusive home gripped by fear and where the victims receive frequent death threats, in part over the fact that the two eldest daughters had boyfriends without their father’s approval.

Shafia and his family had come to Canada in 2007, after living in Australia, Pakistan and Dubai over the previous 15 years. On the morning of the deaths, a car was discovered underwater at the upper lock at Kingston Mills with the four bodies inside. A post-mortem examination indicated they died of drowning.

Canada has seen 13 such killings — which are usually seen in countries in the Middle East and South Asia — since 2002, according to Amin Muhammad, a psychiatry professor at Memorial University in Saint John’s, Newfoundland.


The Ugly Ducklings of Bollywood

Sami Saayer on 6, Dec 2011 | No Comments | in Category: Limelight

Sami Saayerugly

Schools in Dubai have an interesting policy. Some schools only give admission to the kids whose elder siblings are already studying in that school. Similar is the story of Bollywood. If an elder sibling is already part of the inner circles of Bollywood and moreover, is successful, chances are that other siblings will get entry rather easily. The likes of a Kareena Kapoor following the success of her sister Karishma Kapoor in style are less likely (and for that you have to be a Kapoor). More often than not, you end up becoming one of the mega failures mentioned in the list below.


Here are the top ten not-so-popular siblings of successful bollywood stars.


10. Shamita Shetty


You know something is wrong when you make your debut with a Yash Raj mega project like Mohabbatein, sharing screen space with bollywood biggies SRK and Amitabh Bachan and then don’t get another film for another two years. What’s even worse is that even after those two years, all you get is ‘Sharara Sharara’ and another item number in Saathiya. By this time your ‘infamous’ photo with a certain Bhatt was more popular than your acting skills.

Luckily, her elder sister does not have much to her credit either, except for an arguably perfect figure and a Big Brother UK win. While the elder sister is now running a restaurant business and judging reality shows, the younger one is looking for a career in interior design. Hopefully, the interior designs will not be as disappointing as her career in bollywood.

Successful Sibling Success Index: 55%

Failure Index: 70%

Failure Rating: 63%

9. Ashmit Patel

You got a hit early with Murder, but then you saw the career graph of co-actors Emraan Hashmi and Mallika Sherawat go up while yours went down. You then tried the serial kisser approach employed by Emraan, but unfortunately miscalculated and did it off-screen, only to get caught in an MMS scandal. As if that wasn’t enough, you tried your hands at being an Assistant Director and ended up making films like Awaara Paagal Deewana and Aap Mujhay Achay Lagne Lagay which turned out to be as bad as your acting.

Despite these epic failures, he didn’t give up and instead, gave Pakistani actresses a shot. His ‘Meera Ji’ stunt failed but the ‘Veena Ji’ stunt turned out to become quite popular among Pakistani’s. What went wrong in the whole process was that people actually forgot that he actually was an actor once. In the words of his very own Veena…

“Ashmit ji… ye kya baat huee?”

Successful Sibling Success Index: 55%

Failure Index: 75%

Failure Rating: 65%

8. Esha Deol

You are a Deol for heaven’s sake. The daughter of Veeru and Basanti! You don’t just have a responsibility towards your siblings but also towards your parents. We understand that ‘Deol Can’t Dance Sala’ but why would you not care to put some effort into your acting?

Esha should thank her stars for Dhoom and No Entry, even though she was hardly the reason for their success. How many launches and re-launches do you need to know that you just can’t won’t make it. Another relaunch by Basanti herself, made us want to say ‘Don’t Tell Me O Esha’ instead of Tell Me O Khuda.

Successful Sibling Success Index: 65%

Failure Index: 70%

Failure Rating: 68%

7. Rinky Khanna

You are the daughter of Kaka and Dimple. That makes a picturesque pairing, doesn’t it? You followed Esha Deol’s path and won the Best Debut: Popular Award, but then you decided to follow her on other things too. Your sister (who is quite pretty) has a unique record of giving flops with both Aamir and Shahrukh. While your sister played wise and ended up marrying a jackpot, you also tied the knot just in time seeing as your career was going nowhere. To be fair, your films were not all that bad. They just lacked the success factor and were so ineffective that I am struggling to write anything about you. Hope you are having a nice married life, Khushi.

Successful Sibling Success Index: 60%

Failure Index: 80%

Failure Rating: 70%

6. Siddharth Koirala
Your wiki page says you are a film actor. That’s fine, but when we look at your films this claim sounds too tall. How can someone with films likePaisa Wasool, Fun and Dekh Bhai Dekh be called an actor. At best you should be called a wannabe actor. Your sister, at one point was the best actress in the industry, with three Filmfare awards to her credit and movies like Bombay, Company, Khamoshi and Agni Sakshi. Your Grandfather and two uncles have been Prime Ministers of Nepal. Try your luck in politics maybe?

Successful Sibling Success Index: 70%

Failure Index: 75%

Failure Rating: 73%

5. Sanjay Kapoor

The biggest achievement of your life was marrying Maheep Sandhu (she was quite a hottie at some point.) However, your actor and producer brothers could not do anything about your career because your acting skills were as good as my cat’s barking skills. Your Prem did not get anyprem from the audience just like so many other movies of yours. Raja did well, but you had nothing to do with it. Are you sure you weren’t adopted? Because Anil has 6 Filmfare awards to his name and has acted in films you can’t even imagine about.

Successful Sibling Success Index: 80%

Failure Index: 70%

Failure Rating: 75%

4. Sohail Khan

Congratulations. You have won the award for The Most Irritating Khan in the industry. Have you tried singing? No? Why not? Because you have had a go at acting and writing and you suck at both. You were in the movie called Do Knot Disturb then why did you disturb us with your acting in the film? The only thing you were decent at was direction but you have already quit that for acting (that’s just awesome). Exactly how many more lousy performances before you decide to call it quits? Fortunately for you, your brother really cares for you.

Successful Sibling Success Index: 90%

Failure Index: 70%

Failure Rating: 80%

3. Tanisha Mukherjee

Kill me for I saw Neal and Nikki, the worst possible excuse for a movie. Your skin show in the film was just as horrible as your acting. You are the daughter of Tanuja, niece of Nutan and Kajol’s sister for God’s sake. Nutan has as many Filmfare Awards as are the number of your films; eleven. Even your elder sister has 5 Filmfare awards to her name. So what went wrong with you? There are several stars whose siblings are not good at acting, which is why they decided to stay away from the film line and made a name for themselves in something they were good at. Why on earth did you not do the same?

Successful Sibling Success Index: 85%

Failure Index: 85%

Failure Rating: 85%

2. Uday Chopra

If we were to make a battalion of disappointing star children/siblings, you will be given the command of that force. Yes, you are that damned good. To set the premise, do you know Yash Chopra? He is your dad. He has made Amitabh Bachan and SRK what they are today. Do you know Aditya Chopra? He is your brother and also one of the most powerful men in the industry. He created DDLJ. If they can do this for others then did you ever ask them why they couldn’t do it for you? I’m sure you did and that’s why they gave you a shot at everything. Several films and then a production and writing stint ‘Pyar Impossible’ (watching which was also impossible). I would advise you to stick to the Dhoomfranchise and do not disturb otherwise. It has been speculated that you are now focusing on film direction and studying for it at UCLA? God help us.

Successful Sibling Success Index: 95%

Failure Index: 85%

Failure Rating: 90%

1.Faisal Khan

The world could not see drastically opposite talent under one roof. Born just one year after Aamir Khan, you should be publicly lynched for your acting in Mela and Madhosh.You were so bad that your own family decided not to give you a chance again. If only you were Salman Khan’s brother, you would have worked in many more films, but Aamir Khan is (thankfully) different from Salman and has some mercy on the public. There is a bit of your fault in that too though. What were you thinking when you sent threatening letters to Aamir 7 years back?


Successful Sibling Success Index: 100%

Failure Index: 100%

Failure Rating: 100%

PPMA claims PIC deaths were caused by wrong drugs prescription

ISLAMABAD: The Pakistan Pharma Manufacturers Association (PPMA) has claimed that patients in the Pakistan Institute of Cardiology (PIC) did not die due to the usage of poisonous/substandard drugs, but died due to the wrong prescription of ‘blood thinning’ and lipid lowering medicines to them without taking their past medical history into consideration.

PPMA Chairman Asad Muhammad Khwaja said the pharmaceutical industry of Pakistan was exporting its medicines to 60 countries. He said the PPMA’s member pharmaceutical factories last year exported medicines worth $193 million to 10 Asian states including Azerbaijan, Turkmenistan, Tajikistan, Kyrgyzstan and Kazakhstan, besides the Philippines and Far-East and African countries. He said 30 percent increase was being seen in the pharmaceutical industry in the current year.

Asad Khwaja said there were about 615 pharmaceutical factories in Pakistan out of which only 20 factories were foreign. He said the drugs that caused death of over 80 patients in the PIC were sent to our Central Drugs Testing Laboratory in Karachi where all these medicines were termed quality drugs.


�Interest-based economic system root cause of all evils�

PESHAWAR: The Voice of Traders, a newly formed body of the businessmen, has vowed to struggle for improvement of trade and business with a new vision of introducing reforms in this vital sector of economy.

Addressing a gathering on Sunday, trader leaders said Pakistan’s economy could be put on track by introducing reforms and adopting interest-free banking.

The body’s chairman, Malik Ihsan Elahi, said the organisation formed in 2011 aimed at giving a new vision and suggestions to the chambers of commerce and industries and trade unions for bringing reforms and working for the unity and welfare of trade organisations in the country.

He said the 35-member body consisting office-bearers, the executive council and board of governors would work for uniting the trade organisations and struggling for the overall improvement of trade and business.

He said the body would be extended to other parts of the province and the country. He said there should be a portfolio of trade minister at the provincial level and the minister should be elected from the trade organisations, new laws should be framed for dealing with trade and traders and unnecessary harassment and arrest of traders be avoided. He said that drastic reforms were needed in the trade sector and traders’ access to international market should be made easy.

Ihsan Ilahi also called for reforms in the Federally Administered Tribal Areas (Fata) and Provincially Administered Tribal Areas (Pata) to bring an end to kidnappings for ransom. He asked the chief justice to pursue the petition seeking an end to usury as the country’s economy could be put on track to progress and prosperity if interest-free banking and economic system was introduced.

“Interest-based western economic system is the root cause of all evils and it has made the country dependent on the World Bank and International Monetary Fund,” he argued. Addressing the function as chief guest, District Coordination Officer Siraj Ahmad Khan lauded the organisation’s manifesto and efforts and assured the administration’s help in solving traders’ problems.

He said the traders of the provincial metropolis faced great hardships and losses with courage and supported the government in the maintenance of law and order. However, he said Peshawar was nowadays facing two main problems i.e. price-hike and traffic jams, and asked the traders, especially of the inner city, to cooperate with the administration in the removal of encroachments.

The encroachments on footpaths have made life miserable for pedestrians as well as motorists and shopkeepers and trade leaders can play a vital role in coping with the problem, he added. The DCO said that around 180,000 vehicles were plying the Peshawar roads daily while the capacity was for around 50,000 vehicles only.

He admitted that the ongoing development work on roads had aggravated the situation, but said the work would be completed before the stipulated time and the traffic problems would be solved to a great extent. ‘Voice of Traders’ General Secretary Zafar Khattak, Abdullah Khan, Imran Aziz of the All Pakistan Commercial Exporters Association, Mamoor Khan and Humayun Fazal also addressed the function.


The Three Generals

Ansar Abbasi on 29, Jan 2012 | No Comments | in Category: Debate Desk

Ansar Abbasig4

The three retired generals, who had submitted their statements/affidavits before the Supreme Court in the Asghar Khan case, have hurt their own institution more than anything else by admitting that the ISI had been doling out money to political parties and leaders but without having any concrete evidence that it was done on the orders of the political leadership.
None of these generals, former COAS General Aslam Beg, ex-DG ISI Lt General Asad Durrani and former interior minister late Maj General Naseerullah Babar, had anything concrete to show to the apex court that it was the then President Ghulam Ishaq Khan and his Election Cell that had ordered the military-led ISI to distribute money among anti-PPP politicians and political parties over 30 years back.

If there was any such order, it could be a verbal direction from the then president, who too has expired. The very admission of the former army chief and the ex-DG ISI that the ISI did distribute money amongst politicians, political parties and journalists, is a clear indictment of the elite intelligence agency of the country whereas there is no proof in writing that Ghulam Ishaq Khan had ordered the same.

No less than the ex-DG ISI Asad Durrani, who during his tenure as ambassador to Germany under Benazir Bhutto’s regime, had admitted to have done the dirty work as chief of the ISI, had forewarned the then Prime Minister Benazir Bhutto that GIK (who was alive at that time) could pretend ignorance from this shame, as indeed he never involved himself directly.

While the generals have exposed themselves and their institutions, none of the “beneficiary” political parties and politicians have admitted to have received the money. The PML-N, Jamaat-e-Islami, Muttahida Qaumi Movement etc all have denied receiving money from the ISI while most of the politicians and journalists, named in the list of beneficiaries have also rebutted the claim of the generals.

Durrani in his affidavit had confessed to have distributed the money but contended in a secret note that he wrote to the then prime minister, which is now part of the Asghar Khan case, that the operation not only had the ‘blessings’ of the president (GIK) and the whole-hearted participation of the caretaker PM, but was also in the knowledge of the Army high command (Gen Beg).

In the same note, he shared with Benazir Bhutto that Gen Beg’s involvement would be the disgrace for many but still he would have to be protected. Durrani’s intentions apart, there is nothing in writing today that GIK or the then caretaker Prime Minister Ghulam Mustafa Jatoi had issued any such order.

Former army chief Aslam Beg, in his statement, had even admitted that it was the practice with the ISI to support candidates during elections under the direction of the chief executive of the government. In his statement submitted before the apex court in the case, the former army chief said that the then DG ISI Lt Gen (retd) Asad Durrani had acted within the limits of the “lawful command” received from the then President Ghulam Ishaq Khan’s Election Cell.

According to his interpretation: “A superior can give a command for the purpose of maintaining good order or suppressing a disturbance or for the execution of a military duty or regulation.” But Beg did not have anything in writing that proved what he called a “lawful command” had come from the then president and the prime minister and that it was not the work of the military and the ISI.

General Beg would now have to explain this as well before the apex court that how does he think that an order, if it really existed, for the distribution of money to a selected group of political parties, leaders and journalists was a “lawful command”. What makes this whole operation “lawful”? Why did General Beg or General Durrani not question the verbal command of their political masters? Why did the two top men, representing the military establishment at that time, not gather the courage to seek in writing what Ghulam Ishaq Khan and Ghulam Mustafa Jatoi allegedly wanted from them?

General Beg admitted that it was in his knowledge that it was a practice with the ISI to support candidates during elections under the directions of chief executives of the government. “The receipt of this amount by the ISI from Younis Habib in 1990 was also under the directions of the chief executive.”

He said that the DG ISI had also told him that the policy of financial support to the candidates was laid down by the President’s Election Cell and that the DG ISI was acting on their behalf and made payments to various politicians and persons as directed. He will have to explain whether the so-called Election Cell was legally constituted and if it could issue such orders, which apparently were meant to derail the democratic system.

He also disclosed that during his meeting with the then President Ghulam Ishaq Khan, he had informed the president about the donations made by Younis Habib and its utilisation by the DG ISI under the instructions of the President’s Political Cell. However, there are no minutes of any such meeting available in the official record.

Beg recalled that in 1975 Zulfikar Ali Bhutto, the then prime minister, created a Political Cell within the ISI. “As a result, the ISI was made responsible to the chief executive i.e. the prime minister/president for all matters of national and political intelligence. After the establishment of the Higher Defence Organization in 1976, the ISI continued to be responsible to the chief executive, while the Joint Staff Headquarters maintained administrative control only. This was the situation which existed in 1990 and continues even today.”

General Naseerullah Babar, in his affidavit, also stated that he did not want to damage the military in any manner by probing the Mehrangate scam but in reality he too did what may possibly shift all the blame on generals as the politicians were apparently too smart not to have accepted the money in their names or through crossed cheques.

Pakistan’s Parallel Culture

Abu Bakr Agha on 26, Jan 2012 | 4 Comments | in Category: Insight

ed

In a foreign country, where you are a minority, perhaps you learn the true value of your origins. I always treasured being from Pakistan, but going to college in the United States gave me the unique opportunity to personally represent my country in various events.

I did not expect the average American to know much about Pakistan, but I was surprised at the image most locals had. If the person I was speaking to was not a political science or geography major, he or she would most commonly assume Pakistan to be a land which was mostly desert, and inhabited by poor, uneducated people. My ability to speak the English language was a major shock to many, as was the knowledge that parts of Pakistan are covered in snow permanently and that nearly all American fast food chains are present in all the major cities.

The average American did not know about Pakistan and the average Pakistani at all. And why should he? But then it suddenly struck me, that maybe I didn’t know who the average Pakistani was either.

I was right. For some reason the average Pakistani in my mind was like me and my friends; students, trained to speak English from a very young age, educated in the British system of GCE O and A Levels. We took pride in our culture and arts but our dressing sense was western, so was our music, TV shows, movies and even our favorite places to eat. What all of us had in common was that our parents could afford, or were willing to pay the large amount of tuition that the schools we went to asked for.

The reality however is that today 50% of over 170 million Pakistanis are in poverty. Given that figure, it is safe to say that the vast majority of Pakistan’s youth cannot afford the school that I went to. Because of his or her family’s financial status, the student would have to go to a public school of much lower standard. The public schools are much cheaper, but for the most part, do not teach the English language well, nor do they give education of an acceptable enough standard to be comparable to private schools.

Education is a basic human right, and quality of it should not depend on one’s ability to pay. For no fault of their own students depending on their parent’s financial status can turn into completely different people in Pakistan. Public schools and private schools have entirely different syllabi. The expensive private schools follow the British education reform’s General Certificate of Education (GCE), while the rest of education in Pakistan that is overseen by the government is divided into five levels; primary (grades one through five); middle (grades six through eight); high (grades nine and ten, leading to the ‘matric’ or Secondary School Certificate or SSC) ; intermediate (grades eleven and twelve, leading to a Higher Secondary (School) Certificate or HSC); and university programs leading to undergraduate and graduate degrees.

The problem with government schools is that funding for infrastructure and education is so low that the standard has become appalling. The books are outdated, teachers are underpaid, and classrooms are falling apart. As a result High school or SSC graduates from public schools have a very different understanding of the world and modern philosophies compared to students from private schools.

Better quality education opens one’s mind, and it can be argued that it makes one more liberal. This is because you are exposed to various schools of thought and therefore might be more tolerant of certain things. You become more open minded as you are out in the open to different philosophies of morals, ethics, life and religion. I have distant cousins who I meet often who have not had the fortune of going to a good school like me and it’s amazing how different we are. They are understandably more conservative, but some of their views about things like religion are in my opinion very strict and at times, frighteningly violent.

Fighting Phantoms in India

Aijaz Zaka Syed on 25, Jan 2012 | 18 Comments | in Category: Debate Desk

Aijaz Zaka Syedfreedom

When I first heard of Salman Rushdie I was at university. The Satanic Verses had set off a perfect storm in India and around the world. The book was banned in India following fiery protests by Muslims. Many died in Mumbai when police opened fire on angry protesters. Then came Ayatollah Khomeini’s fatwa sanctioning the novelist’s death, sparking a global debate on free speech and “excessive” Muslim sensitivity.

One day, discussing artistic freedom in one of his lectures, Prof Isaac Sequiera, who headed the English department at Osmania University and taught us American literature, launched a blistering broadside against Khomeini’s fatwa and attempts by “some people” to curtail free speech. Prof Sequiera was one of those brilliant teachers who would draw you to the class day after day. Yet it wasn’t easy to stomach his critique of the Muslim response to Rushdie’s book, comparing it to the infamous Spanish Inquisition. Was it the same thing?

The church burnt ‘heretics’ on mere hearsay – and everyone who didn’t subscribe to its worldview – at stake. When Galileo suggested that the earth was round, rather than flat as the Church insisted, he was given a chance to reconsider his opinion while he spent the rest of his life behind bars.

Rushdie, on the other hand, has repeatedly abused his creative license, and the divine gift of creativity, to assail a billion people’s revered icons. As someone born in a Muslim family, he knew what he was doing and its possible consequences.

No freedom is absolute – not even in the anything-goes West. Blasphemy is a serious crime in many European nations including in Denmark. Every freedom is qualified. Every right comes with responsibility. You can’t go around happily waving your big stick and hitting people in the name of freedom. The freedom of your stick ends where my nose begins. And if you think you have a right to offend, well, others have an equal right to take offense. If Rushdie is free to exercise his creative freedom to attack people’s sacred icons, shouldn’t his victims too have a right to exercise their freedom of action to deal with him?

Of course, I couldn’t say all this to my teacher. Blame it on my moral timidity or the fact that I was painfully shy and the only Muslim in the whole class. That was nearly two decades ago. Today, as this row over Rushdie’s participation in the Jaipur literary festival rages on, I am amazed by the fact how little has changed in this whole debate over the past two decades.


The Muslims are upset over the invitation being extended to someone whose name has become a curse word for them. On the other hand, the increasingly shrill voices in the media are crying themselves hoarse as they invoke India’s fabled tolerance while ignoring the sentiments of the minority community.


Indeed, more than their concern for the nation’s secular ethos, it’s their intolerance of all things Muslim that has them batting for Rushdie. They defend his right to visit his ‘motherland’ oblivious of the fact that the man has repeatedly heaped abuse and scorn on the same motherland and its icons in his books, from Midnight’s Children to Shame to The Moor’s Last Sigh.

The late premier Indira Gandhi took Rushdie to court over Midnight’s Children which describes her as a ‘black widow’. He was forced to expunge parts of the book that had Sanjay Gandhi accusing his mother of killing his father, Feroz Gandhi, by neglecting him. Rushdie argued in court that it was only fiction, only to be snubbed by the judge who pointed out that Indira and Sanjay Gandhi were real people.

In the case of Satanic Verses too he hid behind the same fig leaf launching cheap attacks on the noble Prophet, peace be upon him, and his blessed household, outraging his billion plus believers. As a Persian line goes, you could take liberties with God but not with His Prophet. And Rushdie knew it.

The outrage was deliberate – just as most of his books have been deliberately offensive and provocative. He loves to provoke and offend because it sells in the West. And Islam and its icons and followers have been fair game for centuries. Free speech? Gimme a break! Freedom and free speech have nothing to do with it. Even the so-called liberals and Hindutva fanatics cheering for the author and lecturing Muslims on tolerance know it. They love him because the Muslims loathe him.

That said, the way this whole issue has been handled by the Muslim leadership – if there’s such a thing as Muslim leadership – makes one extremely uncomfortable. Except for Asaduddin Owaisi, the young leader of MIM who saved the day once again, not one Muslim talking head could survive the likes of Arnab Goswami of Times Now, India’s answer to Fox News. Once again the bumbling lot did not merely fail to present their case explaining why Rushdie isn’t welcome; they managed to make a laughing stock of the whole community.

This week CNN IBN’s Sagarika Ghose had two Muslim ‘leaders’ pitted against two ‘liberals’ on the panel. One gentleman, an eminent lawyer associated with the Babri Masjid case, had one hand on his earpiece the whole time as he struggled to make sense of the brutal attacks by the anchor and her guests. And studio guests and audience couldn’t understand half the things the other gentleman, a former Maharashtra MLA, kept muttering in a chaotic mix of Urdu and English talking of an ‘international conspiracy’ against Muslims. With friends like these, who needs enemies?

Do these guys really represent and speak for a 200-million strong, diverse community? More important, why do we get repeatedly bogged down in the same old, festering issues when we have far more serious challenges and problems staring us in the face?

As much as I am repelled by the ‘satanic’ Rushdie, I can’t help being intrigued by the question that has been raised by others too – why now? Rushdie has apparently been quietly and frequently visiting India over the past few years. Does it have something to do with the assembly elections in five states, including Uttar Pradesh, next month as some suggest? Given the propensity of political parties to raise such issues to excite the easily excitable Muslim public opinion so they could soothe it later, the possibility cannot be dismissed.

Of course, Rushdie will remain unwelcome as long as he remains unrepentant. And by protesting against his abuse, Muslims are only exercising their democratic rights and the suggestion that they’re undermining India’s future is ridiculous. We cannot however allow characters like Rushdie and controversies like these to define us and our agenda forever. We must choose our battles wisely. For we have far bigger wars ahead of us.

From our political and economic dispossession to our situation in education and employment sectors, the level of our deprivation is simply overwhelming. A TV documentary this week, again on CNN IBN, on the legendary weavers of Benares, literally fighting for survival with their emaciated, starving children, should be a must-watch for every Muslim.

It’s the same story with the once famous artisan communities in UP, from Aligarh to Moradabad to Bareilly and Kanpur, and the general state of affairs across the Gangetic belt. Indeed, the condition of Muslims in north India, once the power centre, is today worst in the country. When will Muslim leaders and those who claim to champion the community take up these real issues? When will we stop expending all our time and energy on fighting phantoms and chasing chimeras?

Power producing province to get priority: govt

ISLAMABAD: None other than the World Bank has severely opposed the government’s proposal to grant first-usage right to the province producing electricity, arguing the policy does not make sense for an integrated power system, reveal official documents available with The News.

“The bank also expressed its opinion that the policy will most likely be economically inefficient since it will preclude the trade of power across the provinces,” the documents state. The government is planning to introduce amendments in the power policy 2002 and to this effect, the committee, headed by Secretary Water and Power Imtiaz Kazi and comprising four secretaries of the provinces, has finalised the amendments, including this critical proposal that based on the location of the power plant, the electricity requirements of the province or local area be given priority. In case the said amendment is approved by the CCI, the electricity crisis will touch a new high in the Punjab, which generates only 30 percent electricity but consumes 60 percent. Surprisingly, however, the Punjab representative in the committee did not oppose the move when the committee finalised this recommendation. While the Punjab maintained a mystifying silence over the proposed amendment, the World Bank has opposed the said amendment.

It is pertinent to mention that under the 18th Amendment, there is a clause in the Constitution under which the gas deficit has become the highest in the Punjab as compared to other provinces. Under the said clause, the province producing gas has the fist right to consume it and the remainder is to be passed on to such federating unit where gas is not abundantly available. This is the main reason that the Punjab is facing a massive gas deficit leading to a massive surge in unemployment as many industrial units have virtually closed down in the wake of non-availability of gas. If the CCI approves the recommended proposal, the Punjab will be exposed to ever more power outages.

Under another proposal that has also been finalised by the committee, the Water Use Charge (WUC) will also be increased to Rs0.425 per unit without annual indexation. The WUC will be reviewed every five years in order to determine whether an increase in the WUC is necessary. In this case, the World Bank has said that the every five years, the WUC review must not be left open ended. Farooq Energy Company has opposed this proposal saying that an increase in WUC is a pass-through item and would lead to higher average hydro tariff.

The committee has also decided that carbon credits earned through clean energy projects from the UN will be utilised for project maintenance and welfare of affected people on an equal basis. The World Bank said that the recommendation should be consistent with the mechanism to share carbon revenues as explained in the government policy for the development of renewable energy 2006.


Is PM Gilani using Pasha�s extension as a bargaining tool?

ISLAMABAD: Prime Minister Yusuf Raza Gilani has raised the issue of DG ISI Lt. Gen Shuja Pasha’s extension at an interesting stage where the spymaster’s testimony before the Memo Commission is eagerly awaited.

General Shuja Pasha is all set to hang his boots on March 18, 2012, a date by which he is likely to have given his testimony. In the absence of Mansoor Ijaz, who has refused to come to Pakistan because of his security concerns after the PPP government successfully intimidated him, Gen Shuja Pasha’s testimony would be the most vital.

Mansoor Ijaz has, according to sources, in his secret letter to the Chief Justice of Pakistan, which was kept in wraps by the court on Monday, asked CJ Iftikhar Chaudhry to give him his personal assurances that he would not be stopped from returning to his country after he has testified in the Memo Commission. It is not clear whether any such precedent exists that the CJ can give his personal guarantee to a witness.

Talking to media persons on his return from Davos after attending the World Economic Forum Conference, the prime minister is reported to have said, “Any decision about the extension of DG ISI would be taken at an appropriate time.”

There is no explanation as to why did the prime minister say this but given the track record of the rulers and their style of soiled politicking, Gillani may use the extension card as a lever to get Pasha softened on memo issue. However, those, in Pakistan Army, who know Gen Pasha well are ready to vouch that Pasha is not a saleable commodity.

Only last week, Gen. Shuja Pasha submitted his statement before the Parliamentary Commission on National Security and reiterated his earlier stance before the SC i.e. he is satisfied that Mansoor Ijaz had enough corroborative material to prove his version of the incident.

In the absence of Mansoor Ijaz and even otherwise, the testimony of Shuja Pasha before the Memo Commission is vital for the reason that Gen. Pasha had met Mansoor in London on Oct 22, 2011 where Mansoor had shared with him in fair amount of details about the circumstances leading to the drafting of memo and why it was delivered through him.

In his statement before the SC and the NA Committee, Pasha had stated that after having seen the means of communications used and as produced by Mansoor Ijaz, he was satisfied that Mansoor had enough corroborative material to prove his version of the incident.

Like Mansoor Ijaz, the government would definitely want Pasha not to appear before the Commission or soften his stance and not to share the kind of details, which could be embarrassing for the government. At this stage, the government may smartly play the trick of giving a choice to Pasha i.e. embarrass the government or get the extension.

It was the memogate, which recently created serious differences between the civilian and military leadership with the former terming the memo a non-issue while the later terming it a serious issue of national security that required serious probe.

For the same reason, the prime minister launched repeated attacks on Pakistan military and even went to the extent of saying that the army chief and the DG ISI had acted unlawfully and unconstitutionally in their response to the SC’s notice issued to them in the memo case.

However, later the prime minister backed off and retracted all the venomous statements that he had issued against his own army and ISI.

In his latest statement, the PM Gilani said that he wanted to move beyond a series of statements (against army) that had almost cost him his government. He refused to talk about his earlier statements about the responses of the army and intelligence chief in the memogate case before the Supreme Court. “I do not want to revisit the matter. We acted against those responsible,” he said, referring to former Defence Secretary Naeem Khalid Lodhi, who the premier sacked after the Inter-Services Public Relations issued a strongly-worded rejoinder to Gilani’s statement in China.


Medical board for Aafia demanded

LAHORE: DR Fouzia Siddiqui, sister of Dr Aafia who is a Pakistani citizen and imprisoned in the US, has called for the setting up of an independent impartial medical board in the light of the memo received by Pakistani embassy regarding the ailment of Aafia. She also demanded suo moto notice by the Supreme Court over the setting up of an independent medial board for Aafia’s proper examination Talking to the media and addressing different demonstrations on Sunday, Dr Fouzia Siddiqui disclosed that the embassy of Pakistan had received a memo from Carswell Prison, US, raising concerns over Aafia’s health and confinement issues besides mentioning the disease of cancer in her.

Monday 30 January 2012

Fertiliser client list critical for $700m US funding

ISLAMABAD: From compiling a customer list of a particular fertilizer plant in Pakistan to other measures, the US and Pakistan governments are working closely to ensure the continuation of the US $700 million funding tied to the certification of US Congress that Pakistan is making progress on counter-terrorism efforts, including the production of Improvised Explosive Devices.

The authenticity of demands of the fertiliser factory’s clients is being investigated to prevent its smuggling into Afghanistan, The News has learnt. The US wants to put in place a mechanism that would ensure that the input chemicals and the end product are not misused.

The modalities and systems of the proposed mechanism have yet to be shared by authorities but related government functionaries insist that efforts are afoot to design a regulatory mechanism that would ensure the fertiliser’s legal use within the country, without any US involvement.

According to an informed insider, US authorities believe that the input chemicals and fertiliser produced by this plant is being smuggled into Afghanistan and used in making IEDs. It is pertinent to point out that fertiliser based IED’s are routinely used by the Afghan Taliban in attacking US and Nato forces.

US and Pakistani authorities are also considering establishing a special force to ensure that products of this particular fertiliser plant cannot be smuggled into Afghanistan. Pakistani authorities say that it is not easy to stop smuggling keeping in view the long and porous border between the two countries.

“US authorities gave us the proposal to designate pink color bags to the concerned fertiliser plant but that proposal was turned down by Islamabad’s high-ups on the argument that its smuggling with the involvement of any other country into Afghanistan could cause problems for Pakistan,” said a senior official involved in the crucial talks between Washington and Islamabad.


Monday 23 January 2012

Seminar on road safety

FAISALABAD: There is a dire need to include traffic laws in syllabus to raise awareness among young generation, said Chief Traffic Officer (CTO) Sardar Muhammad Asif Khan.

Addressing a seminar on `Organized Traffic and Road Safety' held under the aegis of city traffic police here Tuesday, he said traffic police were arranging lecturers to create awareness among students.

He appealed to all segments of society to cooperate with traffic police to ensure road safety. (APP)

Exhibition on chemistry at Agri Varsity begins

HYDERABAD: A 5-day exhibition titled "It's all about Chemistry" was inaugurated here on Tuesday at Sindh Agriculture University (SAU), Tandojam.

Organised in collaboration with Pakistan Science Foundation (PSF) and Embassy of France, the expo was inaugurated by French Consul General Christian Ramage and Chairman PSF Dr. Manzoor Soomro.

Speaking on the occasion, the Consul General appreciated the University and highlighted how education in the different subjects of science is being imparted in the schools in France.

Chairman PSF Dr. Manzoor Soomro briefed about the activities undertaken by PSF for the promotion and popularisation of science in the educational institutions of Pakistan.

"Education in an "inquiry based science" at the grass root level is what we need," he underscored.

He added that the teachers as well as students both need to keep abreast of the new developments and breakthroughs in science and that they should also adopt the modern methods of learning science.

Dr. Soomro said that a majority of students and teachers were not attracted to the subject of chemistry which they find 'monotonous' and 'complex'.

"It is with this understanding that the PSF in collaboration with the partners is making efforts to win due recognition and importance which the subject deserves," he said.

Pro Vice Chancellor of Sindh Agriculture University Dr. K.B. Mirbahar also addressed on the occasion. (APP)

Nasim Wali Khan back in politics

PESHAWAR: Asking Awami National Party to grant her a ticket for Senate election, veteran politician, Nasim Wali Khan, Saturday announced a comeback to active politics, Geo News reported.

Nasim Wali Khan, spouse of ANP chief Asfandyar Wali, had given up on politics in 2005, however, she has now decided to run for a slot in the Senate.

Mrs Wali Khan told Geo News that she had formally applied for a ticket and was keen on making it back to the Parliament.

Karachi: Korangi cotton warehouse on fire

KARACHI: A cotton warehouse, in Korangi area of Karachi, has caught fire, Geo News reported.

Owing to the intensity of the blaze, fire tenders from all over the city have been called in for this operation.

According to initial reports it’s ‘Category III’ fire as cotton was a highly inflammable material.

Right now, firefighters are struggling to bring the monstrous flames under control.

Mansoor Ijaz''s name maybe put on ECL: Malik

ISLAMABAD: Federal Minister for Interior, A Rehman Malik Saturday said that Mansoor Ijaz's name could be put on Exit Control List (ECL), Geo News reported.

Talking to media here, after reviewing the progress of Public Corner being developed at F-9 Park, he said, he would have Mansoor Ijaz's name entered in the ECL, if Parliamentary Committee directed him to do so.

To a query, interior minister said Opposition leader in Punjab AssembklyRaja Riaz wanted to ask Mansoor Ijaz as to what was his role in toppling Shaheed Benazir Bhutto’s government and why was he so fond use to spit venom at Pakistan Army and ISI.

Responding to a query on Mansoor Ijaz's security, Malik said the ministry of interior was responsible for it.

To a question, he said that the government could approach a court of law for the registration of a case if the Article 6 is violated.

About the issue of Norway intelligence chief, he said the ministry was probing the matter.

Replying to another question, Malik said, "Parliament will decide on the fate of NATO supply in the upcoming joint session". (APP)

SPSC rectifies result of Forest Officers'' exam

HYDERABAD: The authorities of Sindh Public Service Commission (SPSC) Hyderabad in a corrigendum here on Tuesday informed that the result of departmental examination for Forest Officer held in the month of July 2011 declared vide notification No.SPSC/Exam: (S.S)2011/376, dated 18-11-2011 has been modified.

After modification in the result, the authorities informed that Shahzad Sadiq Gill has been declared as passed in departmental examination for Forest Officer. (APP)

700mmcfd more gas to be injected into system in June: Dr Asim

ISLAMABAD: Minister for Petroleum and Natural Resources Dr Asim Hussain Friday announced that 700mmcfd additional gas would be injected into the system by June 2012, and a three years plan to overcome gas shortage would be unveiled soon. He was addressing a press conference after meeting with office bearers of the All Pakistan Textile Mills Association (Aptama) in Islamabad.

Dr Asim said that the present unconstrained demand of natural gas stands at 6bcfd while production is 4.2bcfd; however, supply to domestic consumers would improve after the extreme cold spell is over. He emphasized that the present government has always adopted the policy of openness and provides realistic and objective presentation of facts regarding the gas crisis.

He said that he is making personal efforts to break cartels’ influence and always upholds merit in decision-making and all gas consuming sectors are provided with gas on equitable basis. The Gas Load Management Programme is always prepared after thorough consultations with all the stakeholders.

The federal minister said that measures on war footing are being taken to bring down the percentage of unaccounted-for-gas (UFG) in the SNGPL and SSGC networks. He warned that strict action would be taken against gas thieves as per the Gas Theft Act.

Dr Asim Hussain said that this is not the time to create confrontations and urged that all stakeholders should cooperate while opposition should provide workable solutions to overcome the energy crisis.

He said that the Ministry of Petroleum & Natural Resources is mindful of its duties and is bringing in positive and investor friendly provisions in all Oil & Gas sector policies. Regarding negotiations underway with Qatar for supply of LNG, Dr Asim Hussain said that Qatar’s Term Sheet would be received next week.

The minister informed that he is proceeding to India for holding talks with the Indian Government on Turkmenistan-Afghanistan-Pakistan-India Pipeline project.


Three Germans held, freed after interrogation

PESHAWAR: Three Germans including a serving colonel of the army were arrested for illegally staying in the provincial capital and indulging in suspicious activities during a raid in the University Town here on Saturday, officials said.

The three foreigners were later handed over to the German embassy in Islamabad after brief interrogation.

A police party headed by superintendent of police (SP-cantonment) along with officials of the intelligence agencies raided a building in the University Town and arrested the three Germans.

They claimed to be part of the diplomatic staff of the German embassy running a liaison office of the diplomatic mission in Peshawar.

The foreigners, however, failed to produce the no objection certificate (NOC),†which all foreigners need for staying in Peshawar due to the uncertain law and order situation in the city and province.

ìThe office was also being run without any authorisation by the Pakistani authorities,î a source said.

A police official, on the condition of anonymity, told this scribe that there were confirmed reports that the office was involved in suspicious activities and had also played a key role in damaging Pakistanís image before and after the Bonn Conference on Afghanistan.

Pakistan had boycotted the conference in protest against a Nato attack on its security post in Salala in Mohmand Agency on November 26 last year in which 24 Pakistani soldiers were killed.

One of the detained men was stated to be a serving colonel of the German Army. He was identified as Colonel Christine Wild. The two other German nationals held from the building were Lawrence and Ralph Smith.

A number of diplomatic missions and international organisations have their offices in the University Town. Some offices of the foreign organizations are also located in Hayatabad and Cantonment areas.

There are reports that some of these offices are involved in suspicious activities. It may be recalled that many foreign nationals, mostly Americans, were detained in recent months and sent back to Islamabad.

Authorities have directed the foreigners coming to Peshawar to obtain an NOC from the concerned authorities so that they could be provided security.

The KP Home and Tribal Affairs Department recently asked the Ministry of Foreign Affairs to shift all the diplomatic missions and offices of international organisations to a single place in Peshawar for security reasons.


North Korea credits new leader with nuke testing

PYONGYANG: North Korea on Friday credited new leader Kim Jong Un with spearheading past nuclear testing, as it adds to a growing personality cult that portrays the young son of late leader Kim Jong Il as a confident military commander.

Kim Jong Un’s youth — he’s believed to be in his late 20s — and quick rise have spurred questions in foreign capitals about his readiness for leadership. But North Korea has dismissed such worries in recent days, saying Kim Jong Un worked closely with his father on military and economic matters.

The North’s official Uriminzokkiri website said Friday that Kim “frightened” the country’s enemies by commanding nuclear testing in the past. North Korea tested nuclear devices in 2006 and 2009, but the website didn’t specify which tests Kim oversaw.

Uriminzokkiri described Kim Jong Un as “fully equipped” with the qualities of an extraordinary general, even during his years at Kim Il Sung Military University. The website also repeated the North’s claim that he was involved in satellite launching but didn’t elaborate.

North Korea’s linking of Kim Jong Un to past nuclear testing comes as it pushes for the resumption of long-stalled six-nation aid-for-nuclear disarmament talks that also include China, Japan, Russia, South Korea and the United States. Washington and its allies want the North to first show it is serious about previous disarmament commitments.

North Korea last week questioned Washington’s generosity and sincerity, but suggested it remains open to suspending its uranium enrichment program if it can get the food aid it wants.

Kim Jong Un took over after his father and longtime ruler Kim Jong Il died in mid-December and has quickly been given many of the country’s most important titles.

He was introduced as heir only in September 2010. Before that he had been kept out of the public eye for most of his life. He was quickly promoted to four-star general and named a vice chairman of the Central Military Commission of the Workers’ Party of Korea.

Some of North Korea’s neighbors and Washington have expressed worry about whether he can lead a nation of 24 million with a nuclear program as well as chronic trouble feeding all its people.

Kim Jong Il had 20 years of training under his own father, Kim Il Sung, before taking over. Even after his father’s 1994 death, Kim Jong Il observed a three-year mourning period before formally assuming leadership.

A senior official told The Associated Press recently that Kim Jong Un spent years working closely with his late father and helped him make key policy decisions on economic and military affairs.

North Korea has also made it clear that Kim Jong Un will continue Kim Jong Il’s “songun,” or military-first, policy, and a steady stream of reports and images from state media has sought to show him as a fearless military commander who is comfortable with leadership.

North Korea also reported Friday that Kim Jong Un inspected two more military units. Earlier this month, North Korea’s state-run broadcaster aired a documentary that showed Kim Jong Un observing an April 2009 launch of a long-range rocket. It was the first indication of his involvement in the launch.

The documentary quoted Kim as threatening to wage war against any nation attempting to intercept the rocket, which North Korea claimed was carrying a communications satellite but the United States, South Korea and Japan said was really a test of its long-range missile technology.


Sehba Musharraf hires another counsel

RAWALPINDI: Anti-Terrorist Court (ATC) No-I, Rawalpindi, Judge, Shahid Rafiq, on Saturday showed anger against Sehba Mushrraf’s counsel Fawad Chaudhry, who did not turn up to represent his client.

Meanwhile, Sehba Musharraf hired another lawyer, Nayab Gardezy, who on Saturday appeared before the court and told it that previous lawyer, Fawad Chaudhry, has resigned from the APML and requested for more time to prepare the case. The court, however, gave him one day and warned if the lawyer did not appear, the court would decide the case on Monday. The judge said previous lawyer resigned from party but not from lawyer-ship why he did not appear. “Why they are trying to prolong the case,” judge remarks.


Elements in state apparatus reluctant to trust elected leaders: Haqqani

ISLAMABAD: “There are forces in Pakistan that want us to live in fear — fear of external and internal enemies.” So warns Husain Haqqani, until November Pakistan’s ambassador to Washington and now a de facto prisoner of the Pakistani generals whose ire he has provoked.

“But just as the KGB and the Stasi did not succeed in suppressing the spirit of the Soviet and East German people, these forces won’t succeed in Pakistan in the long run, either,” Haqqani told the Wall Street Journal in a wide ranging interview at the Prime Minister House. “I did not craft or write the memo that is currently the cause of controversy,” Haqqani told the Journal.

Admiral Mullen claims to have only a hazy recollection of having received, but not taken seriously, an unsigned memo that did not bear the imprimatur of the Pakistani government. The upshot, as Haqqani points out, is a Pakistani scandal that “involves a memo written by an American and delivered through an American (retired Gen Jim Jones), to an American military official who consigned it to the dustbin.”

“I lived in the United States and taught in the United States,” Haqqani says, referring to his time as professor of international relations at Boston University and his stint as ambassador. “But I never sought American citizenship because I wanted to be able to contribute to the process of reform and the idea of civilian supremacy in Pakistan.”

Haqqani says one of the reasons some people in the establishment hate him so much is because of his book — “Pakistan: Between Mosque and Military”. “In fact, when I was made ambassador, somebody said to me that until you recant your book, you will never be forgiven by the Pakistani establishment.”

He explains that “Pakistan has a long history of military intervention in politics. There were years when the military did not directly intervene but used proxies. “Throughout the 1990s, we had four changes of government and forced early elections each time. For example, among the first allegations against Benazir Bhutto was that she was somehow going to compromise the country’s nuclear programme. So, there are elements entrenched in the apparatus of state who are very reluctant to fully trust the elected leaders of the country.”

The Journal pressed Haqqani on the invisible pressures on President Asif Ali Zardari’s unpopular government. “Soon after I resigned President Zardari fell ill,” he notes. “The psychological-warfare machine tried to give it the colour of President Zardari fleeing the country. He went (to Dubai) to get treated and then came back.” Speaking perhaps as much to reassure himself as to lend some support to Zardari, Haqqani adds that “In all psychological warfare, if the targets keep their nerves, then nothing happens.”

As ambassador in Washington, Haqqani was often referred to as “silver-tongued,” a man able to communicate effectively with officials of different political persuasions. Cultivating a relationship with a senator based on shared appreciation of a book on, say, tribal warfare, was the kind of thing that came easily to him. He says he represented Pakistan diligently at a time when US-Pakistani relations were deeply strained. “There is a longstanding culture of grievance in Pakistan,” he says. “A lot of Pakistanis feel the US has not always been responsive to Pakistan’s geo-strategic concerns. The Pakistani national narrative also says that Pakistan has been deserted by the United States many times. And the US has not done enough to try and change that national narrative.”

As for the current US administration, he says that it “does not have the human resources right now to fully understand the complexities of Pakistan and engage with them. They don’t have the people who understand.”

The traditional pattern of US-Pakistan relations has been that American intelligence wants working relations with Pakistani intelligence, and the State Department wants working relations with Pakistan’s foreign office. “The US will have to find a balance between their immediate needs and the long-term usefulness of their actions,” says Haqqani. “They always say the civilian government is ‘too weak’ for them to engage with. But how will the civilian government become strong if, on all major issues, US officials keep running to Pakistan’s military leaders for advice and consultation?”

Still, Haqqani is not about to blame the US for Pakistan’s failures to develop into a normal state. The progressive dreams of the country’s founder, Muhammad Ali Jinnah, have been “shattered by religious extremism and repeated military interventions in politics.” Enunciating his words carefully, he adds: “While I respect the Pakistani armed forces, I certainly do not support the idea of a militarised Pakistan.”

“Sometimes I wonder if Salman Taseer’s fate awaits all those of us who stand up for a different vision for Pakistan.”


Verdict on writing to Swiss govt to be accepted: PM

LAHORE: Prime Minister Yusuf Raza Gilani has said if the Supreme Court rules in favour of writing a letter to the Swiss authorities, the government will accept it and implement the verdict.

He also assured that any court ruling about $60 million, lying in the Swiss banks, would also be accepted and implemented. Talking to reporters after the 9th Convocation of the Lahore College for Women University (LCWU) on the university premises, Gilani promised that the government would respect all court decisions. “My appearance in the Supreme Court shows that we respect the court and that the government believes in strengthening the institutions,” the premier said.

Replying to a question, the PM said: “We have a mandate for five years, and I am the first prime minister in the history of Pakistan who has served the country for the longest period without any support from the army.” He said all his actions were in accordance with the Constitution and for the rule of law. However, he termed the opposition’s demand for early elections illogical.

The premier said parliament, and not any other country, would decide the fate of supply route for the North Atlantic Treaty Organisation (Nato) forces, stationed in Afghanistan. He said the supply routes were closed, Shamsi Airbase in Balochistan was got vacated from the US forces and Bonn conference was boycotted by Pakistan after the US-led forces launched an attack on a Pakistani check-post on Nov 28, 2011.

“We did it because we are not answerable to any other country,” Gilani said, adding that Pervez Musharraf had succumbed to foreign pressure and accepted the US demands on a single phone call. He said the issue had been referred to the Parliamentary Committee on National Security. After getting its recommendations, a joint session of parliament would be convened for a final decision. “The government will be bound to follow the decision,” he added.

Gilani said there would be no institutional clash if all state organs perform their duties within their ambit. The PM said a dictator came into power claiming that he would end corruption and poverty, but he failed to do so even after remaining in power for a decade. He claims that the nation was missing him and that he will come back. “But we want to tell the nation that there is no chance of his coming back,” he added.

Gilani said the government challenges the opposition for any upcoming election and would compete with it with full confidence. He said it was the job of the opposition to criticise the government and the people should let them fulfil their duty. Rejecting allegations of the opposition partiesÇ he said the nation knew what the opposition parties had done during their terms in office.

The PM said he would not make tall claims that all problems of the people had been solved. However, he assured that the government would overcome the energy crisis and end electricity and gas loadshedding within six months by resolving the issue of circular debt. He said over 3,300 megawatt electricity had been added to national grid.

Gilani said the government had presented the national economic policy in the National Assembly, and it would be approved after the opposition parties extended their suggestions in this regard.

Earlier, the prime minister addressed the convocation. Referring to his appearance in the Supreme Court on Thursday, the prime minister said in a lighter vein: “Yesterday, I was among the black coats, and today among the black robes (a reference to gowns of the graduating students).”

Agencies add: The prime minister said if the institutions worked within their ambit as defined by the Constitution, then there would be no rift.

Regarding the opposition’s call for an early election in the country, Gilani said the opposition wanted to humiliate the government but it was an elected government’s duty to show magnanimity towards them.

PM Gilani said he had given a policy statement about the economy on the floor of the National Assembly and the government was waiting for proposals from the opposition in this regard. “My government takes pride in the fact that the National Assembly passed a unanimous Bill on National Commission on the Status of Women yesterday,” he added.

Lauding the role of LCWU, the premier called upon the management to produce future leaders and professionals, who could face upcoming challenges. He directed the Federal Ministry of Information Technology to set up an IT campus at the LCWU and asked the university management to prepare PC-I for restructuring and refurbishing of a library in the next ADP.

About the role of the media in today’s Pakistan, the prime minister said he sees it responsible rather than hostile. Prof Dr Bushra Mateen, former vice-chancellor of LCWU, was awarded the title of Professor Emeritus by PM Gilani.


MQM does not want division of Sindh: Altaf

SUKKUR: Founder and leader of th Muttahida Qaumi Movement (MQM) Altaf Hussain has stated in unequivocal terms that the MQM does not want the division of Sindh. The MQM wants to create harmony, brotherhood and unity among the permanent residents of the province. The MQM is against the division of Sindh whereas the so-called nationalists were acting on the plans to divide the province by their poisonous propaganda at the behest of foreign powers.

He expressed these views while talking to the MQM office-bearers and workers who were making preparations for the MQM Convention ‘Strong Sindh, Prosperous’ Pakistan in Sukkur on 27th January.

Members of the Interior Sindh Tanzimi Committee (ISTC) and Sukkur Zone informed Mr Hussain about the preparations being made for the convention and the public fervour.

Hussain said that the MQM has been struggling for the rights of the people of Sindh, and it will continue to do so in future as well. The so-called nationalists, on the other hand, who had called a strike against the 20th Constitutional Amendment Bill of the MQM paving the way for the Hazara and Seraiki provinces, had always compromised the rights of Sindh.


Record corruption in FBR during 2011

ISLAMABAD: Corruption in the Federal Board of Revenue during 2011 was more than that of two previous years.

The Taxation (Income Tax, Customs, and Federal Excise) remained third while Police remained second and Land Administration (The department of Patwaris) was first.

According to a survey conducted by the Transparency International (TI) the fourth position was attained by subordinate courts, fifth position by electricity and its distribution companies and 6th position was attained by the official purchasers (Tenders contracting).

Police department was the most corrupt 5 years back in 2006 followed by electricity and its distribution. In the third position was subordinate courts and land administration acquired fourth position, income tax fifth and customs 6th, health 7th position, education 8th position, railways, 9th position.

According to the survey conducted by the TI on September 28, 2011, the rate of increase of corruption in the income tax and customs departments were alarming.

The TI adds that in 2009 and 2010 there was gradual reduction in the rate of corruption because of discouragement on the part of chairman CBR but in 2011 all the previous records were broken.


Zardari discusses Pak-US ties, other issues with generals

ISLAMABAD: President Asif Ali Zardari on Friday held an informal meeting with Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of the Staff Committee General Khalid Shameem Wynne and services chiefs over a cup of tea at the Presidency.

The meeting took place after President Zardari decorated the naval chief, Admiral Muhammad Asif Sandila, with Nishan-i-Imtiaz (M) at a special investiture ceremony at the Aiwan-e-Sadr.

As refreshments were served after the ceremony, the president held informal talks with Chairman Joint Chiefs of Staff Committee (CJCSC) General Khalid Shameem Wynne, army chief General Ashfaq Parvez Kayani, Air Chief Marshal Rao Qamar Suleman and Admiral Muhammad Asif Sandila. No one-on-one meeting was held. It was an informal meeting in which they discussed matters relating to national security and defence. Sources privy to the meeting said the recommendations of the Parliamentary Committee on National Security for new terms of engagements with the US also came under discussion. Earlier, President Zardari decorated Admiral Muhammad Asif Sandila with Nishan-i-Imtiaz (M).


FBR chairman retires

ISLAMABAD: Chairman Federal Board of Revenue (FBR) Salman Siddique has retired from service after reaching superannuation.

Federal Minister for Finance Abdul Hafeez Shaikh, federal Minister Makhdoom Shahabuddin, Secretary Finance Waqar Masood and Secretary Commerce Zafar Mahmood on behalf of the secretaries hailed the services of Salman Siddique at the Economic Coordination Committee’s meeting here on Friday.

The finance minister said it was a matter of satisfaction that Salman Siddique carried forward the reforms introduced by his predecessor Sohail Ahmad. Speaking on the occasion Salman Siddique thanked everyone and said every bureaucrat has to be positive in thinking.

On the advice of the prime minister the president will appoint the next FBR chairman. However till the regular appointment is made, senior most member Mahmod Alam will be the Acting Chairman FBR.

The government is under political and judicial pressure and under the prevailing circumstances it is likely that ANP leaders may be able to prevail and get appointed Aziz Bilour, the younger brother of Ghulam Ahmad Bilour and Bashir Bilour as FBR chairman. Currently Aziz Bilour is working as Secretary Industries.

If the FBR’s chairman appointment will be made from the Customs Service then the experienced and honest Senior Member Customs and an officer of BPS-22 Mumtaz Hyder Rizvi may be appointed as FBR chairman. A senior officer of District Management Group and Chief Secretary Punjab Nasir Mahmood Khosa is also being considered to be appointed as FBR chairman.


Courts to check abuse of power by institutions: CJ

KARACHI: Chief Justice of Pakistan Justice Iftikhar Mohammad Chaudhry on Saturday said that the people have trusted the judiciary and urged the judicial officers and lawyers to not let them down.

“Judicial officers and lawyers try their utmost to provide justice to the people as our existence is dependent on the dispensation of justice. If people are disappointed with the institution of the judiciary too, then everyone knows what the consequences will be,” he observed while addressing the oath-taking ceremony of the newly elected body of the Karachi Bar Association here at the Sindh High Court lawn.

“The destiny of our institution is in our own hands. If we cooperate with each other and ensure that the very purpose for which we have been created is fulfilled we stand a good chance of being vindicated in the eyes of the public,” he observed.

In his speech, the chief justice also highlighted the role of the judiciary in a democratic setup and said that the judiciary has to act as an independent institution exercising jurisdiction within its constitutional domain.

“The judiciary as a custodian of the Constitution has to check constitutional deviation and the arbitrary exercise of power by the other institutions so as to ensure rule of the law and fair administration of justice,” he observed.

“In the present democratic set-up, the judiciary is trying to buttress democratic and parliamentary norms. It has never tried to assume the role of the executive or the legislature rather it respects the integrity and independence of every other institution,” he observed, adding that the judiciary always played its part within the parameters of its constitutional domain. “The role of the judiciary is not that of an opposition to the legislature or the executive. However, in cases of unauthorised action in utter violation of legal or constitutional norms, the judiciary has to exercise its power of judicial review,” he added.

Taking notice of the target killings of lawyers in Karachi, the chief justice directed the administration to look into the matter with regard to lawyers’ security and protection. He asked the chief justice of the Sindh High Court to take up the matter of the murder of Maqboolur Rehman advocate with the law enforcement agencies and other administrative authorities. The advocate was shot dead by unidentified people this month.

He said that the Supreme Court in the Karachi law and order situation case had declared that both the federal and provincial governments should safeguard the fundamental rights of citizens, observing that protection of the life and liberty of citizens is the responsibility of the state. He said that the Supreme Court will take action if any violation of its order is found and further directives will be issued for compliance of the court orders.

Regarding the shortage of judges in the Sindh High Court, the chief justice said that he conducted meeting with the Supreme Court judges and the SHC Chief Justice over the issue and soon it will be resolved. He asked para-legal staff to call off their strike as due to their agitation the judicial system in the subordinate judiciary is badly affected adding the matter of para legal staff, which is sub-judice, will be decided soon and they should wait for the court verdict in their case. He asked judicial officers to expeditiously decide family and civil disputes as it is very disappointing that child custody and other civil disputes are pending for several years without any decision.

On the lawyers’ problems with regard to enrolment, he expressed the hope the Chief Justice of the SHC will look into the problems being faced by the lawyers and resolve such issues in an appropriate manner. He said that corruption is a vice that is impinging upon the process of fair dispensation of justice and expressed the hope that lawyers will join hand with the judiciary in order to cleanse the judicial and legal system from corrupt practice so as to provide timely access to fair and impartial judicial services. He also asked judicial officers to ensure there should not be unnecessary adjournment in cases and said that judges and lawyers can overcome the evil of unnecessary delays in civil and criminal litigation by setting deadlines for completion of cases and enforcing these deadlines.

The CJ said that much has been done after the National Judicial Policy and much need to be done as the judicial system is still faced with the problems of corruption, protracted litigation and procedural laws, adding that judges of superior courts and judicial officers will again convene a meeting in the last week of January or February for perusal of suggestions in making the NJP more effective and up to date.

Chief Justice of Sindh High Court Justice Mushir Alam said that the issue of shortage of judges will be addressed by February and lawyers from all of Sindh will be considered for filling the vacant positions. President Karachi Bar Association Mehmoodul Hasan and Secretary Khalid Mumtaz appreciated the role of the judiciary for the supremacy of law and the Constitution and presented the problems being faced by the legal fraternity.

A lawyers’ delegation also met the CJP. The chief justice said that he had discussed the matter with regard to the appointment of judges with the Chief Justice of Sindh High Court and necessary steps will be taken soon to increase the strength of the high court.

He met with the office-bearers and a delegation of the Sindh High Court Bar Association, led by its President Anwar Mansoor Khan, Karachi Bar Association, led by its President Mahmoodul Hassan, and Hyderabad as well as Sanghar District Bar Association led by President Mr. Nisar Ahmed Durani and former President Anwar Mehmood Nizamani.

The chief justice said that names for elevation of judges are initiated by the chief justice of the concerned high court and subsequently discussed by the Judicial Commission of Pakistan. The lawyer’s representatives discussed many issues of their concern/interest with the chief justice. The Sindh High Court Bar Association raised the issue of shortage of judges in the High Court of Sindh, because of which pendency is increasing.

The bar members also discussed various problems, including target killing of lawyers in Karachi and issues pertaining to administration of justice, in particular dismissal of cases on technical grounds as well as early dismissal of cases for non-prosecution. The chief justice assured he would look into these problems and have then discussed and resolved at the proper forum.

Chief Justice of Pakistan Iftikhar Mohammad Chaudhry said that loyalty to the state is the duty of every citizen and obedience to the Constitution and the law is the obligation of every citizen including lawyers.

Addressing lawyers enrolled for the Supreme Court from Sindh and Balochistan at the Supreme Court Karachi Registry, the chief justice said that judiciary and lawyers are working within the parameters of the Constitution and hoped that lawyers would continue to work for the rule of law in the country.

He said that judiciary has stopped the way of martial law through its judgment by declaring the provisional constitutional order on November 3 as illegal and unconstitutional. He said that lawyers have to play their role for the supremacy of the law and the Constitution. Meanwhile, the chief justice chaired a meeting of the building committee and reviewed the pace of ongoing development work including the construction of a judicial lock-up.

The meeting, which was attended among others by Justice Anwar Zaheer Jamali, Justice Khilji Arif Hussain, Justice Sarmad Jalal Osmany, Secretary Finance and Chief Engineer S.S. Farooq Kazi. The meeting also reviewed the construction and renovation work of servant quarters for SC employees.

Later, addressing the annual faculty dinner of the S M Law college, Chief Justice Iftikhar Chaudhry said citizens must be made aware of their basic and fundamental rights and basic legal education should also be included as part of general education at all levels.

The CJ said that right to education has been recently included in the chapter of fundamental rights. He said that it is unfortunate that education in general and legal education in particular has still has not been accorded the due importance it deserves.

“When it is said that ignorance of the law is no excuse then it is duty of the state to provide legal education,” he observed.

The chief justice said that the Higher Education Commission should play its role in monitoring the standard of education particularly in the institutions where professional education is being imparted and colleges, universities and other professional bodies must take care of quality and should not compromise on the standard of education.

“The universities, colleges and regulatory bodies especially in the field of the law must maintain the quality and standard of legal education without which the system of administration of justice cannot work properly,” he observed.

The chief justice expressed concern that so far there is no single law university in the country and observed that the judiciary have revised the role and scope of the federal judicial academy to be a centre of excellence where legal education at the highest levels of masters and doctorate would also be imparted alongwith arrangements for conducting special research in related subjects. He expressed the hope that every individual and a nation should set their priorities right and create an enabling environment where education is made the prime national objective. the CJP also remembered late Arfa Karim, the youngest Microsoft certified IT professional and said she is a reflection of the potential our people possess.


Tug-of-war starts for appointing chairman FBR

ISLAMABAD: Senior most Member of the Federal Board of Revenue (FBR) Muhammad Alam will take charge as caretaker chairman of the FBR tomorrow (Monday).

He will attain the age of 60 years in November 2012.

A tug-of-war has started among the DMG and IR/Custom officers for the appointment of the Chairman FBR and politicians have also jumped into the race. The politicians have started visiting Aiwan-e-Sadr and Prime Minister House to get their brothers or favourite officers appointed at the post of the Chairman FBR.

Prime Minister Yusuf Raza Gilani is not in favour of appointment of kin of a political family of Khyber Pakhtunkhwa who is an officer of the Income Tax Group as the Chairman FBR. But the prime minister and finance minister are holding consultations for the appointment of new Chairman FBR.

Member Custom Mumtaz Haider Rizvi is among those senior members who are being considered as the Chairman FBR.

The names of Chief Secretary Punjab Nasir Mehmood Khosa, Secretary Shipping Qazalbash, Secretary Water and Power Javed Iqbal, Secretary Industries Aziz Bilour and Secretary Housing and Works Kamran Lashari are under consideration for the slot of the Chairman FBR.